Dublin home reborn with Enerphit upgrade
In spite of a dauntingly complex and crumbling existing building, a detached house in Donnybrook has been modernised to become Ireland’s 2nd certified Enerphit building.
If this project proves nothing else, it’s that passive standards can be achieved in the most unlikely situations. The decision to go for Enerphit didn’t come until after planning permission had been granted. This put serious limitations on the amount of reworking that could be done in order to achieve the higher thermal performance. In addition, the client had set out precise specifications for the internal layout of the house which were non-negotiable. There were the inevitable budgetary restrictions and with the south side of the house facing onto the street, even the orientation was wrong. Add to that the normal challenges of deep retrofit, this Dublin suburban Enerphit project represents a remarkable achievement for both the design and construction teams.
“The client has a large family and very specific design requirements,” says Archie O’Donnell of Integrated Energy, who was energy consultant on the project. “They wanted open plan living, they wanted lots of light and they wanted to open up the garden.” Because the existing house fell far short of what was required, demolition would have been the first choice, but planning restrictions required an element of retention on the project.
“It was only really during the detailed design stage when we were putting together the tender documents that the client decided to aim for the Enerphit standard,” says architect Alan Burns of Bright Design Architects. “Obviously, it would have been a lot better if this decision had come pre planning. With the south facing orientation on the streetscape, we would have redesigned the facade both on the south and the north to reflect this, and we would have included a bit more shading. Also, we had set certain window sizes and configurations and did not have the option to change them.”
The clients wanted a bright spacious open plan design, as evident by this photo of the main living area, which opens up to the garden
It was design with one arm tied behind your back. And the biggest challenge, everyone knew, would be airtightness. The house had been extended many times over the years, which meant that there were a variety of wall types, including nine inch hollow block and cavity wall, with some brick faced fronts. There were particular concerns about air infiltration in the rising walls.
Though the client would have liked to retain some of the internal walls and existing timber floor, he conceded that these would have to be removed in order to facilitate the airtightness strategy.
Even at that, it was felt at tender stage that while all other Enerphit criteria could be met, the air change rate of 1 ACH would be a bridge too far. For that reason, the tender documents specified a slightly higher air change rate in order to protect the budget. Cyril Mannion of Mannion Passive House Builders won the tender, and though he had no contractual obligation, he nonetheless committed to achieving the Enerphit airtightness standard at the existing budget.
Archie O’Donnell says that at the beginning, the plan was to retain as much of the existing building as possible. “That would have included all of the outer four walls and the first floor timbers, but on investigation it was found that because of extensions over the years and because of the use of a lot of hollow block, the rear wall was in a bad state and couldn’t be retained. On top of that, the timber joists were damaged at the end grain, and they had to be replaced.”
The reality was that the existing structure was not fit for purpose and ultimately only the bare minimum could be retained. “We were left with this skeleton of a house,” says Cyril Mannion. “To be honest we were nearly afraid it would fall, so we were tiptoeing around that for a while until we got it back up again.” Deemed unsavable, the left hand gable was demolished and rebuilt, with two courses of low thermal conductivity Quinn Lite blocks used to reduce cold bridging at DPC level.
While the structure was dry, the internal faces of walls had considerable mould growth in bathrooms and some bedrooms to the north of the house due to surface condensation.
The form of the building was driven largely by planning constraints and the client’s requirements. But though the passive imperative may have arrived post planning, Bright Design’s plan had in any case embodied many low energy principles. A dual aspect living space neatly captures solar gains from the south facing street, while a terrace in the front garden helps keep that space private and informal. In addition, the glazing strategy had also taken account of maximising solar gains without risking overheating. Roof glazing, for example, introduced heat and light into the core of the house via a stair course.
Bespoke roof windows introduce additional heat and light into the core of the house, down through the stairwell
Archie O’Donnell explains that with so many design elements fixed, he concentrated much of his efforts on the building fabric. “We would rather put the performance into the solid aspects, so overcompensate on walls, roofs and floors and then be able to reduce the spec on the high variable cost items; things like windows.” While the windows are very high quality; tripleglazed and featuring class four airtightness, they are not thermally-broken passive certified units. The insulation strategy, as with so many deep retrofits, centred on wrapping the building in a thick, continuous layer of external insulation. According to window supplier Brian Raftery of True Windows, the company prides itself on the airtightness of its installations. “In today’s built environment, the discerning clients are looking to a standard of 0.6 ACH for their building. The material we install meets this requirement time after time.”
One of the most critical elements of the build lay in detailing the myriad junctions in order to deliver both the right aesthetic and the right thermal performance. Archie O’Donnell of Integrated Energy and Alan Burns of Bright Design drew up more than 24 separate construction details before the project went to tender. “There was a huge amount of time spent thinking about it and working it out,” says O’Donnell. “There were very complex junctions with roofs, with existing walls to new walls and new thresholds with existing thresholds...It was the kind of thing that you must think out completely before you hit the site.”
It was a painstaking, iterative process. The architect might begin with a detail of what he wanted to achieve aesthetically and the energy consultant would then add details on insulation and airtightness. These drawings were shared in the cloud, moving back and forth between them until each was agreed and finalised.
The detailing also captured how airtightness was to be achieved. While Intello membranes were specified as both airtightness layer and vapour check, again, the complex series of junctions in the house required detailed specification by the design professionals. And onsite, because airtightness is about process as much as product, delivering results required close attention to detail. Cyril Mannion erected a sign in the kitchen: ‘This is an airtight building with underfloor heating. No drilling.’
Mark Shirley of 2eva performed two airtightness tests on the house. The first result came in at 0.7 ACH, well inside the Enerphit standard. “If we had done nothing else with it,” he says, “that would have been an exceptionally good result because the building is large and architecturally complex.” He points out that experience is key to getting a good airtightness result, and notes that the more projects a builder has worked on, the less materials he needs to achieve a set target.
The second test hit 0.63 ACH, which Shirley points out is on the cusp of full passive. “That’s a 10 per cent improvement between first fix and final test...To have an Enerphit project into the realms of a new build passive house is quite exceptional.”
According to lighting designer Rocky Wall of Wink Lighting, the lighting design was driven by energy efficiency without compromising on aesthetics. “The net result is a super-efficient lighting system that compliments the architecture of the building,” says Wall, adding that downlighters were kept to a minimum to avoid compromising the airtight layer. “Also downlighters are a very poor light source,” says Wall. “They were really only designed to highlight an object or a feature. They became fashionable because of their physical size as opposed to their illuminating ability.” Instead the lighting strategy relies predominantly on LEDs and fluorescent lamps, including innovative dimmable LED wall lights.
Mechanical contractors Noel Geraghty Heating & Plumbing were responsible for installing the heating, plumbing, BEAM MVHR and central vacuum systems, solar thermal and rain water harvesting systems throughout the building. Given the stringent airtightness target of 1 ACH that the project had to hit, it was critical that all of the sustainable mechanical systems installed operated cohesively together without compromising the precious airtight layer. “There was very close coordination between the architects, consulting engineers, Cyril Mannion and the mechanical and electrical contractors to ensure that airtightness wasn’t compromised,” says Noel Geraghty, who has over 20 years experience in domestic, industrial and commercial installations. Service voids were built within the airtight layer with the main service penetrations entering the building via the sub floor. “We’re very proud to have been part of this project and delighted to have contributed to its certification.”
Ventilation required quite a bit of design work. It was decided that the house would be divided into two separate regions, each with its own MVHR unit, extracting and supplying the rooms in its half.
“The client was very particular about his acoustic requirements,” says Alan Burns. “He didn’t want sound transfer within reason between bedrooms and the hall, or between bedrooms and each other.”
In order to achieve this, the bedrooms were fitted with drop-down acoustic seals, which were automatically lowered from within the door leaf when the door was closed. While this achieved the acoustic separation the client wanted, it interfered with the passage of air that the ventilation strategy required. In response, it was decided to extract and supply to each room individually, or, in the case of en suites, to extract from en suite and supply to its adjoining bedroom. Extra ducting was required to make this work, with additional acoustic attenuators to limit sound transfer via the MVHR system. There were also knock-on effects on the Enerphit calculations. The use of two systems required additional energy, which was compensated for by improvements to the fabric, and of course the better than expected airtightness performance.
But because all of these issues were modelled and thoroughly dealt with during the planning stage, the build itself progressed very smoothly. Contractor Cyril Mannion reports an overrun of just three days. “It was all well planned,” he says, “there were no major problems, no major hiccups.”
Selected project details
Architect: Bright Design Architects
M & E engineer: Ramsay Cox & Associates
Civil / structural engineer:
Barrett Mahony Consulting Engineers
Energy consultant: Integrated Energy
Main contractor: Mannion Passive House Builders
Client's representative: McCarthy & Associates
Quantity surveyors: Duffy Gaffney Partnership
Landscape gardening: Doylescapes
Mechanical contractor: Noel Geraghty Heating & Plumbing
Electrical contractor: CTS Electrical
Airtightness tester/consultant: 2eva.ie
External insulation system: Sto
Below DPC wall insulation: Kingspan Aerobord
Sarking board & floor insulation: Xtratherm
Glass fibre insulation: Isover Ireland
Flat roof felt & insulation: Moy Materials
Cellulose insulation: Warmcel
Cellulose insulation installer: Ecowise
Thermal blocks: Quinn Lite
Airtightness products: Ecological Building Systems/Alfa
Windows & doors: True Windows
Roof lights: Ruhm
Condensing boiler: Worcester Bosch
Solar array: Kingspan Renewables
Room sealed gas fires: Heating distributors
Underfloor heating & solar subcontractor: Base Engineering
Underfloor heating system: Hevac
MVHR & central vacuum syustem: Beam Central Systems
Lighting design: Wink Lighting
Rainwater harvesting: Kingspan Environmental
Building type: 367 sq m renovation and extension to a 1960s detached house
Location: Donnybrook, Dublin 4
Completion date: September 2013
Budget: not disclosed
Enerphit certification: certified
Space heating demand (PHPP): 21 kWh/m2/yr
Heat load (PHPP): 12 W/m2
Primary energy demand (PHPP): 109 kWh/m2/yr
Before: heating and hot water bills had been €4-5,000 per annum – and the building wasn’t able to maintain 18C during the heating season.
After: an estimated total for heating/hot water of circa 8800/2700 kWh, totalling circa €850 per annum.
Airtightness (at 50 Pascals): 0.63 air changes per hour
Original walls: a combination of uninsulated cavity wall and single leaf nine inch hollow block walls.
Upgraded/extension walls: Acrylic render finish on 200mm White EPS 90 insulation fixed to existing structure or to 215mm new blockwork walls. Hard plaster scratch coat to internal face of walls, 38mm battened service void with 12.5mm skimmed plasterboard finish. U-value: 0.17
Original ground floors: suspended timber floors, uninsulated. Upgraded & extension ground floor: timber floor on 75mm screed with underfloor heating on 160mm PIR insulation on 200mm reinforced concrete slab on continuous radon barrier / DPM lapped and sealed on sand blinding on hardcore. U-value: 0.131
Original roof: cut timber roof with circa 100mm fibre glass insulation on attic floor.
New roof: Roadstone mini-slate concrete roof tiles fixed to treated battens, on a Pro clima Solitex Plus waterproof membrane over counter battens, on 60mm Xtratherm XT sarking board on timber joists [11%] on 225mm Metac glass fibre insulation. Continuous Intello airtight membrane taped and sealed with Pro Clima Tescon tape to underside of joists, with 60mm service void filled with Metac between battens. U-value: 0.115
Flanking roofs: as above on slope except with 175mm rafter, no plasterboard and no service cavity. Flat of flanking roofs includes Paralon roofing felt and 120mm of Paratorch insulation; 225 cellulose and Intello airtightness membrane. Slopes of flanking roofs include 80mm Xtratherm sarking board, and 175mm pumped Warmcel celluloseinsulation, and Intello airtight membrane.
Original windows & doors: double-glazed PVC windows, glazed hardwood front door and doubleglazed hardwood windows and doors to rear utility.
New triple-glazed windows: HolzPlus timber aluclad frames with IV 78 windows and doors, class four for airtightness. Glass U-value of 0.6. Frame U-value for fixed unit: 1.0 Frame U-value for opening unit: 1.1
Roof windows: two bespoke triple-glazed Ruhm Flushlight roof windows. Centre pane U-value: 0.8. Two Fakro U6 roof windows with Thermo flashing system. Overall U-value: 0.81
Before: standard efficiency gas boiler and radiator system.
After: 30kW 93% efficient Worcester Bosch Greenstar modulating condensing gas boiler with Heatmiser PRT-TS / PRT-NTS controls & radiators. Two 6.97 kW 81% efficient Gazco Studio 2 balanced flue – room sealed – gas fires.
Domestic hot water: 5 sq m Kingspan HP400 solar panels & 200L storage cylinder Ventilation
Before: some wall vents.
After: Passive House Institute certified Dantherm HCH5 heat recovery units, with summer bypass, 77% efficiency (including air duct losses)
Lighting: predominantly LEDs and fluorescent lamps, including dimmable LED wall lights.
Water: Kingspan Water ENV100 Envireau Gravity System with 3000L storage capacity for flushing toilets and irrigating gardens
Green materials: cellulose insulation, GGBS
Passive House Plus digital subscribers can view an exclusive image gallery for this article. Click here to view